Quantile Capital: Inspect More, or Fix the Line?

Operations
medium35 min0 submissions
BCG
Scenario

Quantile Capital manufactures asset management products in UK, running 821,376 units a year.

Internal quality checks reject 7.3% of output, at a scrap and rework cost of about £748 a unit. A further 1.8% of shipped units come back under warranty, each costing roughly £3281 once field service, replacement and admin are counted.

Two proposals are on the table. Engineering wants £28 M of one-off capital to re-tool the station where most defects originate. Quality wants £39 M a year of additional inspection headcount to catch more before shipment.

The plant manager is measured on unit cost.

Supporting data

volume

units per year
821376

proposals

process retool one off m
28
additional inspection per year m
39

external failure

cost per claim
3281
warranty claim rate pct
1.8
warranty units per year
14785

internal failure

defect rate pct
7.3
defective units per year
59960
scrap rework cost per unit
748
Your task

Advise the plant manager. Your answer should provide:

  1. Analysis — the total cost of poor quality today, split by where it is detected, and the return on each proposal.
  2. Risks — what each option does not solve.
  3. Recommendation — which to fund, with a payback period.

State any assumptions you make.

Ready to move forward? Up next: Vantage Analytics: How Much Stock Is the Right Amount?Next question
How you'll be graded

80 points, 60% to pass.

  • recommendation20
  • market analysis15
  • risk assessment20
  • financial analysis25
Hint
Reveal suggested structure

Cost of poor quality = internal failure + external failure. Compare prevention against detection on payback, and note that inspection does not reduce the defect rate.