Marlow Chemicals: Inspect More, or Fix the Line?

Operations
hard35 min0 submissions
Morgan Stanley
Scenario

Marlow Chemicals manufactures specialty chemicals products in India, running 656,805 units a year.

Internal quality checks reject 6.3% of output, at a scrap and rework cost of about ₹944 a unit. A further 0.8% of shipped units come back under warranty, each costing roughly ₹2932 once field service, replacement and admin are counted.

Two proposals are on the table. Engineering wants ₹87 Cr of one-off capital to re-tool the station where most defects originate. Quality wants ₹25 Cr a year of additional inspection headcount to catch more before shipment.

The plant manager is measured on unit cost.

Supporting data

volume

units per year
656805

proposals

process retool one off cr
87
additional inspection per year cr
25

external failure

cost per claim
2932
warranty claim rate pct
0.8
warranty units per year
5254

internal failure

defect rate pct
6.3
defective units per year
41379
scrap rework cost per unit
944
Your task

Advise the plant manager. Your answer should provide:

  1. Analysis — the total cost of poor quality today, split by where it is detected, and the return on each proposal.
  2. Risks — what each option does not solve.
  3. Recommendation — which to fund, with a payback period.

State any assumptions you make.

Ready to move forward? Up next: Northwind Energy: This Market Size Looks Too BigNext question
How you'll be graded

80 points, 60% to pass.

  • recommendation20
  • market analysis15
  • risk assessment20
  • financial analysis25
Hint
Reveal suggested structure

Cost of poor quality = internal failure + external failure. Compare prevention against detection on payback, and note that inspection does not reduce the defect rate.